Picking a mioty gateway for an industrial site in 2026 comes down to three questions: how many devices does it need to carry, how far is the signal traveling, and does the network server on the other end actually decode what the gateway sends. Brand name is a distant fourth.
This guide ranks the gateway classes and vendors worth shortlisting for industrial mioty deployments, and where each one runs out of road.
- The best mioty gateways for industrial IoT deployments split by device density and site type, not brand name.
- Kerlink's mioty-enabled Wirnet iBTS wins for mixed LoRaWAN/mioty campuses — buy for multi-protocol sites.
- Diehl Metering base stations fit utility-scale rollouts with device counts running into six figures.
- Sentinum's compact units cover single buildings well but skip them for wide outdoor coverage.
- A mioty gateway is dead weight without a network server that decodes it cleanly — verify that first.
Why this matters
A gateway is the one piece of hardware you don't get to swap out casually once it's bolted to a roof or a pole. Get the device density or the outdoor rating wrong on an industrial site — a mine, a cold storage yard, a shipping terminal — and you're paying a crew to climb back up.
mioty was built for exactly this kind of deployment: thousands of low-power sensors reporting on a schedule, spread across a site with real RF noise. The technology behind it is telegram splitting, which breaks a transmission into sub-packets sent across different times and frequencies, so a single gateway can hear far more devices without collisions than a standard single-channel receiver.
That matters before you even open a spec sheet. If you're already sourcing mioty-based industrial monitoring sensors for a site, the gateway you pick has to match the density and range those sensors are actually going to need — not the density a vendor's marketing page advertises.
How we ranked
Every gateway here got evaluated on five things: documented device density, outdoor IP rating, power options (PoE versus solar versus mains), whether the vendor supports both LoRaWAN and mioty on the same unit, and how straightforward the path is to get its output into a network server that actually understands mioty's telegram-split payloads.
mioty itself is standardized under ETSI TS 103 357, finalized in 2020, so any gateway claiming mioty support should be measured against that spec — not against a vendor's own marketing claims about range or capacity. Vendors that publish independent test data score higher than vendors that don't.
The ranked list
1. Kerlink Wirnet iBTS (mioty firmware) — the multi-protocol veteran
Kerlink added mioty support to its Wirnet iBTS line as a firmware option around 2021, letting the same outdoor unit run LoRaWAN and mioty side by side. The housing carries an IP67 rating and runs on PoE+, which matters when the box is going to sit on a roof for the next five years without anyone touching it.
For a site that already has a private LoRaWAN network running — a mixed industrial campus, a shipping yard, a mine site — adding mioty coverage on the same hardware avoids a second pole and a second power run. That's the whole pitch: one antenna footprint, two protocols.
Verdict: Buy for any site already committed to LoRaWAN that wants mioty coverage without new steel in the ground.
2. Diehl Metering base stations — the utility-scale specialist
Diehl Metering runs mioty base stations across municipal water and gas metering programs, some with device counts running into six figures on a single network. That scale is the point of telegram splitting in the first place — thousands of static endpoints, each reporting a few times a day, without collisions swamping the gateway.
The hardware is metering-first, and it shows. Strong on raw device density, thinner on the flexible dashboarding an industrial ops team wants day to day for alarms and equipment monitoring.
Verdict: Buy if your deployment is metering-shaped. Skip it if you need per-device alarm logic and a live dashboard on top — that's a platform job, not a gateway job.
3. Sentinum mioty gateways — the compact building unit
Sentinum builds smaller-footprint mioty gateways aimed at single buildings and small industrial sites rather than city-scale metering rollouts. A cleanroom, a distribution center, a single cold storage facility — that's the size class this hardware fits.
The tradeoff is coverage. These units aren't built to blanket a sprawling outdoor campus the way a carrier-grade unit is.
Verdict: Consider for one-site deployments where a carrier-grade outdoor gateway is overkill and budget matters more than multi-site scale.
4. STACKFORCE reference-design gateways — the integrator's blank canvas
STACKFORCE licenses the mioty protocol stack and hardware reference designs that OEMs and systems integrators build their own gateways on top of. That means the actual product you receive depends entirely on which integrator implemented the stack and how well they did it.
This path can produce a very good gateway. It can also produce a mediocre one with a support contract that goes nowhere. There's no way to know until you ask for test data.
Verdict: Hold unless you already have integration engineering on staff or a systems integrator ready to own the firmware relationship long term.
5. Retrofit gateways with bolt-on mioty firmware — the retrofit gamble
Some gateway hardware built originally for LoRaWAN or cellular backhaul now ships a mioty firmware module as an add-on rather than native support. Telegram splitting is the hard part of mioty to implement correctly, and a bolt-on implementation can quietly underperform the link budget the standard promises.
A spec sheet claim without a published test result is a guess with a price tag attached.
Verdict: Skip unless the vendor publishes independent link-budget or packet-loss test data for the mioty add-on specifically, not just for the base LoRaWAN hardware.
The gateway is half the deployment
None of the five options above matter if the network server behind the gateway can't reassemble telegram-split payloads back into one reading. That reconstruction step happens in software, not in the radio.
Kilo IoT's platform, Kilo Cloud, ingests mioty connectivity alongside LoRaWAN and MQTT, which means the same rules engine and alarm logic that watches your LoRaWAN sensors can watch your mioty fleet too — no separate dashboard, no second alarm system to babysit. Before buying any gateway on this list, confirm the industrial IoT network server software you're running actually parses the mioty payloads that gateway sends. A lot of deployments stall right here, after the hardware is already on the roof.
Comparison table
| Gateway | Best fit | Device density | Outdoor rating | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerlink Wirnet iBTS (mioty) | Mixed LoRaWAN/mioty campus | High | IP67 | Buy |
| Diehl Metering base station | Utility/metering rollout | Very high | Vendor-rated for outdoor | Buy for metering |
| Sentinum mioty gateway | Single building/small site | Moderate | Indoor/light outdoor | Consider |
| STACKFORCE reference design | Custom OEM integration | Depends on build | Depends on build | Hold |
| Retrofit bolt-on mioty | Budget LoRaWAN upgrade | Unverified | Varies by base hardware | Skip |
Where to source them
- Buy through mioty Alliance member vendors or their listed regional distributors. RF certification differs by region — 868 MHz in the EU, 915 MHz in the US — and gray-market hardware often ships with the wrong band for your site.
- Get network server compatibility confirmed in writing before the hardware order goes out. A gateway with no ingestion path is a shelf ornament, and returns on industrial radio equipment are rarely painless.
- Pilot one gateway before committing to a multi-site rollout. If you're scaling across locations, work out the device management platform for multi-site ops question before the second site, not after the fifth — a lab spec sheet number rarely survives contact with a real roof and real interference.
See how Kilo Cloud handles mioty data
One platform for LoRaWAN, mioty, and MQTT — dashboards, rules, and alarms in one place.
FAQ
What's the best mioty gateway for industrial IoT deployments in 2026?
Kerlink's mioty-enabled Wirnet iBTS is the strongest pick for mixed LoRaWAN/mioty campuses in 2026, while Diehl Metering base stations lead for utility-scale metering rollouts with six-figure device counts.
Is mioty better than LoRaWAN for industrial sites?
Neither wins outright — mioty's telegram splitting gives it an edge on device density and interference resilience, while LoRaWAN has a bigger hardware ecosystem. Many industrial sites now run both on the same gateway.
How many devices can one mioty gateway support?
The mioty Alliance specification lists up to 1,000,000 end devices per base station, though real-world density depends on reporting frequency and RF conditions at the site.
Does mioty need a special network server?
Yes. A mioty network server has to reassemble telegram-split sub-packets back into one reading, which standard LoRaWAN-only network servers can't do without mioty-specific decoding support.
What frequency band does mioty run on?
mioty operates in sub-GHz ISM bands: 868 MHz in the EU and 915 MHz in the US, matching regional radio regulations for unlicensed spectrum.
How much does a mioty gateway cost in 2026?
Pricing varies by vendor, region, and whether the unit is carrier-grade outdoor or compact indoor hardware. Get a direct quote from the vendor or distributor for your specific site requirements.
Can one gateway run both mioty and LoRaWAN at the same time?
Yes. Kerlink's Wirnet iBTS line, for example, added mioty as a firmware option around 2021 alongside its existing LoRaWAN support, letting one unit cover both protocols.
When was mioty standardized?
mioty was standardized by ETSI as TS 103 357 in 2020, giving the protocol a formal spec independent of any single vendor's implementation.
One last thing
The part of mioty that doesn't show up on a gateway spec sheet: telegram splitting means a device can still get its message through even after losing a chunk of its sub-packets to interference, because the network server reconstructs the reading from whatever pieces survived. That's the actual reason mioty gateways handle noisy industrial sites better than a single-channel receiver — not the antenna, the math behind it.
